Yes. DBCC CheckTable is basically the same thing except
it only does one table. DBCC CheckDB generated the same
error.
[vbcol=seagreen]
>--Original Message--
>Have you tried a DBCC CHECKDB ?
>Peter
>"The length of this document defends it well against the
>risk of its being read."
>Winston Churchill
>
CHECK[vbcol=seagreen]
messages,[vbcol=seagreen]
REPAIR_ALLOW_DATA_LOSS
>select
>it
>.
>
http://www.karaszi.com/SQLServer/inf...suspect_db.asp
Tibor Karaszi, SQL Server MVP
http://www.karaszi.com/sqlserver/default.asp
http://www.solidqualitylearning.com/
http://www.sqlug.se/
"VanColeJones" <anonymous@.discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message
news:064801c518fd$15f1d550$a601280a@.phx.gbl...[vbcol=seagreen]
> Yes. DBCC CheckTable is basically the same thing except
> it only does one table. DBCC CheckDB generated the same
> error.
> CHECK
> messages,
> REPAIR_ALLOW_DATA_LOSS
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment